Independent Citizens Action Network

 Home Up Feedback Contents Search

Centennial ES
Up 21st Century TF Littleton Academy Centennial ES Performance Pay SAR Ratings

 

 

[JPG 416KB]  On June 12, 2003 the LPS Board of Education approved the May 19 request to change the school name from "Centennial Elementary School" to "Centennial Academy for Fine Arts Education".  The school then was renamed to "Centennial Academy of Fine Arts Education" in August, 2003 to reflect an emphasis upon fine arts that began with a $100,000 grant from the Littleton Public Schools Foundation (LPSF) for the previous school year.  That grant was in response to the "Centennial Arts for Everyone" (CAFÉ) proposal [PDF 492KB] prepared by Centennial ES staff.  The proposal showed projected costs for 2002-03 amounting to $122,390 grand total.  The expected revenue would be $100,000 from LPSF and the remainder from other non-LPS sources (e.g., other grants); no LPS funds would be used.

At the January 14, 2004 Board of Education work session on the 2004-05 budget, the administration estimated that there will be about $75,000 shortfall in funding for the fine-arts program and then disclosed that the total program costs will be about $160,000 for that year.  LPSF probably would be unable to meet all of its three-year funding commitment of $100,000 each year for 2003-04 as well as 2004-05.  ICAN attempted to identify the planned and actual multiyear revenues and costs for that program.  Our inquiries to central administration on January 21 confirmed the lack of readily-available program-budgeting information for this and other LPS programs.  Of course, cost-benefit analyses and other forms of program evaluation depend upon such information.  On February 12 ICAN was informed that the CAFÉ Program 2002-03 costs actually amounted to $187,683.65, which was $65,293.65 (53%) over the proposed budget.  The actual revenue sources for 2002-03 were $100,000 from LPSF and $87,683.65 from LPS funds.  LPSF provided less than $15,000 in 2003-04 and nothing thereafter for the Centennial fine-arts program.

For the past three school years (2002-05) Centennial has spent over $500,000 total on a fine-arts program that now has an ongoing annual cost of about $160,000 from LPS revenues that district officials decided to not make available to the other LPS schools.  ICAN still believes that those precious funds should not have been used for the Centennial fine-arts program rather than for the basics remediation (reading, writing, and mathematics) that is needed by so many below-grade-level students in Littleton Public Schools.

Centennial has been one of the lowest-performing LPS elementary schools for many years.  The overall decline in 2002-03 in academic achievement as measured by CSAP (Colorado Student Assessment Program) scores may not have been caused by the emphasis upon fine arts.  However, that year's loss certainly raised questions about the so-called cause-and-effect theory that adding more fine arts will cause increased student learning in core subjects.  Comparisons of the CSAP grade-level test results for 2002 (before) and 2005 (three years after) show no overall improvement in academic achievement (59% average proficiency for seven tests for both years).

The Centennial Elementary School average for CSAP (Colorado Student Assessment Program) 2005 Reading grades 3-5 (next table below) was 66% proficient or advanced, which was a moderate loss from the 72% average in 2004.

  --------- Ce CSAP % ---------  
Reading P+A A P PP U S
           
G3 2005 60   1 58 31   8 77
G3 2004 80   4 77 13   7 56
G3 2003 59   0 59 30 11 70
G3 2002 73   7 66 20   7 59
G3 2001 75   9 66 16   6 79
G3 2000 71   4 67 20   7 76
G3 1999 64   5 59 25 10 83
G3 1998 56   1 55 32 10 91
           
G4 2005 67   4 63 25   7 57
G4 2004 52   1 51 32 14 77
G4 2003 74   4 70 21   5 57
G4 2002 62   4 58 18 20 74
G4 2001 63   3 61 32   5 76
G4 2000 56   3 53 32 11 72
G4 1999 50   1 49 30 16 86
G4 1998 46   3 43 25 13 93
G4 1997 44   2 42 28 14 81
           
G5 2005 70   1 69 19 10 83
G5 2004 83   6 77 15   2 53
G5 2003 65   3 62 21 14 71
G5 2002 69   1 68 22   9 74
G5 2001 70   9 61 26   4 76

Key: A = Advanced, P = Proficient, PP = Partially Proficient, U = Unsatisfactory, S = Students.

The school average for CSAP 2005 Writing grades 3-5 (next table below) was 54% proficient or advanced, which was a small gain from the 52% average in 2004.

---------- Ce CSAP % ---------  
Writing P+A A P PP U S
           
G3 2005 52   8 44 42   4 79
G3 2004 49 11 39 47   0 57
G3 2003 53   3 50 43   4 70
G3 2002 60   5 55 36   3 58
           
G4 2005 50   9 46 39   5 57
G4 2004 43   3 40 49   6 77
G4 2003 51   2 49 46   4 57
G4 2002 36   4 32 50 14 74
G4 2001 34   3 32 59   4 76
G4 2000 40   3 38 47 10 72
G4 1999 29   0 29 53 14 86
G4 1998 35   9 27 41   8 93
G4 1997 16   1 15 54 12 81
           
G5 2005 60   6 54 35   5 82
G5 2004 64   8 57 36   0 53
G5 2003 48   4 44 45   7 71
G5 2002 51   5 46 43   5 74

Key: A = Advanced, P = Proficient, PP = Partially Proficient, U = Unsatisfactory, S = Students.

The school average for CSAP 2005 Math grade 5 (next table below) was 54% proficient or advanced, which was a large loss from the 68% average in 2004 for grade 5.

  ---------- Ce CSAP % ---------
Math P+A A P PP U S
G3 2005 56 14 42 33   9 78
G4 2005 69 17 52 21   9 58
G5 2005 54 16 38 32 13 82
G5 2004 68 21 47 26   4 53
G5 2003 49 11 38 38 13 71
G5 2002 62 19 43 28   9 74
G5 2001 47 13 34 41 12 76
G5 2000 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Key: A = Advanced, P = Proficient, PP = Partially Proficient, U = Unsatisfactory, S = Students.

 

Last modified: 09/04/2005

 

Home ] Up ]

Send mail to webmaster@ICAN4.info with your questions or comments about this website.
Copyright © 2003-2005 Independent Citizens Action Network (ICAN).   All Rights Reserved.