Independent Citizens Action Network

 


 

 

LPS "Stonewall" Examples

[Under Construction]

"Stonewall" (keep quiet about "bad news" for a while or forever) examples are identified briefly along with hyperlink references to ICAN website pages and documents for additional information.

Unanswered questions and requests:

  • Request from superintendent:
    • Superintendent Stan Scheer requested on February 26, 2004 that Sam Drury ask questions before drawing conclusions and give Stan opportunity to respond to Sam's conclusions before Sam presents them at Board of Education meetings.
    • Sam was invited to a meeting with Stan Scheer and Bonnie Miller (Assistant Superintendent, Learning Services) on March 8 and to subsequent meetings with Stan or Bonnie.
    • Sam on March 8 and 9 submitted 25 questions to Bonnie and Stan with regard to four subjects:
      • LPS District Improvement Plan (one question).
      • LPS Early Literacy Intervention Program (12).
      • LPS Director of Curriculum and Assessment position (8).
      • LPS below-grade-level students (4).
    • Sam gave to each Board member a copy of those 25 questions at the March 11, 2004 BoE meeting.
    • He also repeatedly told the Board that he had not received any answers to most of those questions [until Sam received on March 9, 2005 an e-mail responding to the Early Literacy Intervention Program questions].
  • Other questions and requests during Board meetings:
    • January 14, 2004 request that the Board reallocate and consolidate the available resources for those students who are functioning below grade level and are being left behind.
    • January 22, 2004 request for public statements from school officials regarding the problem of below-grade-level students.
    • January 22, 2004 request for a future Board discussion of a potential problem analysis regarding enrollment of out-of-district students.
    • February 12, 2004 request for creation of Individual Learning Plans for core-subjects proficiency for below-grade-level students who do not have them
    • February 26, 2004 questions about the appointment of the Director, Curriculum and Assessment, when there is no position description.
    • March 18, 2004 proposal for the Whitman home schooling program with Connections Academy.
    • March 18, 2004 request that LPS performance pay for administrators be considered for an addition to the future agenda.
    • April 8, 2004 request as to when Board Policy IKE, Promotion and Retention of Students, might appear on an agenda.
    • April 14, 2004 questions at BoE Community Forum on budget issues.
    • May 13, 2004 questions about the Littleton High School (LHS) staff presentation of the LHS Interactive Mathematics Program (IMP) plan to the LPS Board.
    • May 27, 2004 request that the LHS IMP soon become a future agenda item.
    • June 10, 2004 suggestion that LPS officials consider the Littleton Academy performance pay practices.
    • June 24, 2004 questions about the Instructional Coach agenda item.
    • Et cetera examples for subsequent meetings and periodic reminders to the Board regarding unanswered questions and requests.

Public records:

  • Administrative Work Plan (AWP):
    • The two members of the public (Pam Cirbo and Sam Drury) who were observers during the December 3, 2004 Board workshop in Colorado Springs were not allowed to see a copy of the AWP which was discussed by the Board in that open meeting.
    • Colorado Public Records Law (§24-72-202, C.R.S.) on "Work Product" per subsection (6.5)(c): "...  does not include ... (IV) Any materials that would otherwise constitute work product if such materials are produced and distributed to the members of a public body for their use or consideration in a public meeting...."
    • Sam finally received the 03/22/05 version of the AWP in response to his December 15 written Public Records Request [PDF 24KB].
    • This LPS "stonewall" example clearly violated the Colorado Public Records Law.
  • Other examples of apparent violations of the letter and/or spirit of the "Public Records Law":

    • Timeliness of responses by LPS has been much longer than Sam's experience with other agencies.
    • Costs of providing access for inspection have been quoted far in excess of past practices.
    • Prices for copies have been quoted far in excess of actual costs.
    • The LPS "Public Request for Public Records Form" [PDF 15KB] that has been required for "public records" requests from Sam since December 15, 2004 has had extremely little usage of that form by other persons during subsequent months.
    • The apparent intent of the above "stonewall" tactics by LPS district officials is to discourage Sam's access to public records.

 

Last modified: 07/06/2005

 

Send mail to webmaster@ICAN4.info with your questions or comments about this website.
Copyright © 2003-2005 Independent Citizens Action Network (ICAN).   All Rights Reserved.