| 11/14/2007 |
| No
charges against Habig |
| By:Peter
Jones , Staff Writer |
Prosecutors in the 18th Judicial District have declined
to file charges against Centennial City Councilmember-elect Betty
Ann Habig. The Ward 1 representative who was elected this month had
been accused of knowingly and/or recklessly disseminating false
campaign information in violation of state law.
Habig was a
founding councilmember who did not seek re-election in 2005. She
defeated incumbent Vorry Moon Nov. 6 in a bitterly contested
three-way race after two unsuccessful runs for the state
legislature.
After an October council meeting during which
councilmembers criticized what they called false or misleading
claims in a Habig campaign flier, civic activist Sam Drury filed a
legal complaint against Habig with District Attorney Carol Chambers.
After a brief investigation, the prosecutor's office referred the
matter to a four-member panel of the Colorado District Attorneys
Council, which this week issued a recommendation that no charges be
filed. The 18th Judicial District accepted the
recommendation.
"The investigation revealed that the majority
of the information Ms. Habig disseminated was obtained through the
city of Centennial records," district spokeswoman Kathleen Walsh
said. "The Colorado District Attorneys Council and the district
attorney's office did not find evidence of fraud. It was reasonable
to assume that information disseminated was correct."
Habig's critics had accused her of violating a state statute
that makes it a criminal offense to knowingly or recklessly "make,
publish, broadcast or circulate ... any false statement designed to
affect the vote on any issue submitted to the electors at an
election or relating to any candidate for election to public
office."
Last year, state Rep. Morgan Carroll, an Aurora
Democrat, cited the law in an unsuccessful complaint about claims
made in automated "robo-calls" to voters, but Republican
prosecutors, Chambers and Attorney General John Suthers, declined to
press charges against the GOP's Trailhead Group.
City
council races are nonpartisan, though Habig ran her unsuccessful
campaigns for the state legislature as a Republican.
The
Class 1 misdemeanor of "knowingly" distributing false election
material is punishable by a minimum penalty of six months in prison
and/or a $500 fine. "Recklessly" doing the same thing is a less
serious Class 2 offense that can bring the guilty party three months
in prison and/or a $250 fine.
Regardless of whether Habig's
individual claims in her campaign literature were entirely factual,
a person could have reasonably drawn the same conclusions by
visiting the city of Centennial's Web site, according to Walsh.
Chief investigator Mike Knight walked away from the case with
essentially the same conclusion.
"She may not have done deep
investigation, but she got those numbers from the city," he
said.
Controversies about Habig's flier first came to light
at a city council meeting in October when city manager Jacque
Wedding-Scott publicly refuted the candidate's claim that her annual
compensation is $262,000. The stated figure actually includes
Wedding-Scott's $145,000 annual salary, plus her benefits package, a
car allowance and the salary of her administrative assistant.
According to Walsh, the city's Web site is arguably ambiguous on
this matter.
"[The $262,000 figure] is the information we
were able to obtain from the city of Centennial's records," she
said. "The information provided by the city's records verified Ms.
Habig's information."
The candidate's flier, revised after
Drury's complaint was filed, originally included a broad range of
charges about city finances, from saying the city was cutting back
on public works services to calling public-utilities franchise fees
and stormwater fees "taxes." They are not taxes by definitions in
state statute.
Drury's letter cited two specific examples of
false or misleading information - the charge about Wedding-Scott's
salary and Habig's assertion that the city had spent $75,000 on a
public-opinion survey. The city in fact spent $15,000 on the survey
as part of a larger contract for other marketing consultation.
Although Drury says he intended the two citations to be
examples of a larger pattern of misinformation, 18th Judicial
District investigators limited the scope of their investigations to
those two claims.
Drury accepts this week's decision by the
district attorney's office, but rejects the assertion that Habig
acted in good faith when she pulled material from the city Web
site.
"Betty Ann isn't just anybody," he said. "She chaired
the budget committee when she was on the council. If she took data
from the Web site and saw those figures, she should have known
better. For example, if it said $500,000 for the city attorney, that
doesn't mean the city attorney gets $500,000. It's his office that
gets it. But that wouldn't get the uninformed voter too excited."
Chambers, a Republican, did not make the final call in this
case, Walsh clarified. Assistant district attorney Leslie Hanson
decided not to file the charges, she said.
Last year, Habig
engaged in a public dispute with Chambers's husband Nathan, the
chairman of Arapahoe County Republicans. Habig sparred with the
official after she was passed over for a midterm replacement to the
state Senate in District 26. Earlier this year, the former
councilmember filed a formal complaint with the Colorado Republican
Party charging district leaders, including Chambers, with violations
of party bylaws. The complaint was rejected by the party attorneys
who investigated the matter.
The contentious District 26 race
had led to Habig's alienation from many Republican leaders. She
later broke ties with various former supporters and left a series of
angry voicemail and e-mail messages - some copied to the Centennial
Citizen - demanding that a number of officials and civic activists
stop contacting her.
Last week, Habig irately told the
Centennial Citizen that she will no longer submit to interviews due
to the newspaper's extensive coverage of her
controversies. Habig's campaign literature is the latest chapter
in the former councilmember's contentious tenure as a civic
activist. The maverick official is known for her tenacity and hard
work, but is equally recognized for her divisiveness. On council,
she differed, often colorfully, with her colleagues on a range of
issues and her outspokenness made her among the most watchable of
Centennial's founding councilmembers. She will be sworn-in again in
January after defeating Moon by a margin of 51 to 39
percent.
Contact Peter Jones at 303-566-4109 or
pjones@ccnewspapers.com.
| |